JWeinCom said:
JoeTheBro said:
zorg1000 said:
JoeTheBro said:
zorg1000 said:
JoeTheBro said:
tbone51 said:
teigaga said:
The worst SKU edition any system has seen ever? I think so |
stop being mad cuz you dont want it, not everybody has a good budget. Its optional, your not force to play 3DS games on it.
|
Dude, at least admit its a horribly cheap SKU. The 2DS is a lot worse than both 3DS versions, but at least its really cheap. Your logic is like saying the white Wii U was a great SKU because it was cheaper. The market showed that isn't how things work.
|
I really like design and dont enjoy 3D so just because u dont like it doesnt make it a horrible sku
|
It has a single speaker that's not even in the center, it is way larger than the other skus yet doesn't have a larger screen, not pocket-able, harder to reach touch screen, and a worse battery life. It's a horrible sku, but at least it doesn't cost a lot.
|
3DS XL, Vita and Tablets arent very pocketable either and nobody seems to complain about them. Surveys have shown adults who play handheld gaming play at home the vast majority of the time and kids dont need to put it in there pockets, they play it while on car rides or walking thru stores with parents or at home or friends house. The battery life is essentualy the same. And its not larger, it just doesnt fold. I have pretty big hands and cant comfortably reach the touch screen on 3DS or XL without holding it in one hand and using the other exclusively for the touch screen, so nothing really changed. That just leaves the speaker as ur argument why its horrible.
|
Think of it this way. Nintendo themselves thinks it's a bad sku. If they thought it was on par to the other ones, they would not be selling it for $40/$70 less.
|
So... the 4 GB XBox 360, the 12GB/250GB PS3, and the Wifi Only Vita are bad skews? 16 GB iPads are bad skus according to apple? 16GB iPhone too? The PSP 3000 was a bad SKU once the PSP Go came out? The DS Lite was a bad SKU? DSi? If Dell makes one computer for $1000 and another for $400 are they saying the $400 is a bad computer? When car companies sell different packages for cars, are they saying the less expensive ones are bad? When Burger King sells the Whopper, are they saying that the Whopper JR is a bad burger?
There are different people in the market, and they have different needs. For a 5 year old who won't use the 3D feature, it doesn't make sense to pay for it. Some people aren't going to need 500 GB on their PS3, but that doesn't mean the cheaper 250 GB model is a bad SKU.
Please retract your terrible terrible statement if you expect to have any credibility in this argument. Otherwise, haters gonna hate.
|
@Bold
Nope. People keep quoiting me and sounding silly doing so. The statement stays up.
As for the content of your post, yes to all of your questions, IF YOU IGNORE PRICE. Why does a person buy the 4GB 360? Because it's cheaper. Why does a person buy the 12GB PS3? Because it's cheaper. Why did those ten people buy the WiFi only Vita? Because it's cheaper. Etc, etc, etc, etc. There are of course a few exceptions like the whopper jr having less calories but you get the point.
I've never said (or at least don't believe I've said) that people shouldn't buy the 2DS. For $130 it's an ok value. The closest I got to saying it wasn't good was my comment about the Wii U basic not being the most popular sku. I've never disagreed with the person saying "yeah it's worse but who cares, $130!"
I have however been arguing against the belief that the 2DS isn't a worse device than the 3DS and 3DS XL. When I made my comment about Nintendo pricing, I was responding to a guy defending its shortcomings. I said all the reasons why it is a bad sku compared to the others and instead of him saying the price counter acts those negatives, he tried to act like the negatives aren't real. Hence I made my comment about Nintendo themselves knowing the negatives are real. If Nintendo thought the 2DS was just as good a product as the 3DS, it wouldn't be $40 cheaper.
