J_Allard said:
You just said it in a post earlier in the thread. It is adorable to read so many qualifiers so there is something to give Sony credit for though. Of course, you're the same guy who has said Sony's handheld interaction with a home console is still innovative and new even though Nintendo did it a generation earlier, because the technology is more advanced. Yet somehow the Kinect doesn't get that same benefit of the doubt. |
What benefit of the doubt should I give MS outside of the Illumiroom has Microsoft invested in for peripherals that Sony or Nintendo haven't already invested in themselves? I love this guy, always on the attack. As for the whole PS Vita thing, I don't believe I ever said that It was revolutionary, I said its superior tech. Nintendo was the first to do work on console to gaming connectivity with the GBA and the GC.
I said the Move is revolutionary, in a sense that they are pushing the camera based motion control space being the first to accurately control, move through and manipulate a 3D environment. If you want to answer the the questions you must realize there is a problem and they've known the answer since 2004, stating it numerous times on video. Nintendo has pushed infrared sensor motion controls even though the started motion controls with outside help during the attempt with the Power Glove.
