polishforlife said: If you mean exactly the same, duh. The point is it would might come close. Haven't reviews mentioned that aside from graphics, the game isn't that much different than the PS2 games? It was a good things for them, but it does mean it wouldn't be out of means for the Wii. Easy as that, so it won't happen because Capcom does not want to. No, the producer (or director) said he doesn't want to. That's certainly not the same as Capcom itself. Also ps2 and gamecube difference are not as big as ps3 to wii. So there would be a bigger difference graphically. So what? It still would cost a fraction of the source game. |
Again, Capcom may choose not to, but you're trying to prove the game would have to be radically altered. It doesn't work that way. There was an even bigger difference between the Dreamcast and the PS1, but by trying to make games for both, the PS1 got some of its most impressive games (like Soul Reaver).
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








