By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MDMAlliance on 27 August 2013
Edit Thread
Hynad said:
Cheebee said:

They were released as Final Fantasy games, right? Anyway, to refer to the original post, I'm pretty sure most everyone would prefer a completely new Pokemon game over the 8th release of a FF one. Or 9th. Or 10th.

I'll take the release of a new Final Fantasy game over any new Pokemon games. In this here case, Final Fantasy XV. ^_-

In fact, I'd rather replay a good classic FF game over any new Pokemon game. 

Re-releasing a game, or porting it doesn't make the game a new one. Unless they're remakes. In which case I added those to the count.


You do know you're making very unfair points.  #1 what it seems like you're doing is counting yellow, red, blue, green, crystal, gold, etc. each as individual releases.  Why would you do that?  #2 You're counting games like Mystery Dungeon and Pokemon Stadium, which are not at all comparable to the Final Fantasy spin-offs like Crystal Chronicles or Tactics  #3 You SHOULD be counting ports and collections because it would only be fair to pokemon as they have no ports/collections/re-releases, only remakes.  Counting X and Y as two separate games is just as bad as counting ports.  #4 Final Fantasy mainline series goes to 15, as in 15 generations.  Pokemon only goes to 6.  You say Final Fantasy is older, but I'm sure you have also noticed that the quality is not consistent with Final Fantasy games.  Pokemon mainline series tend to maintain a level of quality with their games at the least.  It also barely makes any sense to compare the two in the first place considering how different their situations are.  Final Fantasy games tend to be all very diferent from one another (as it should be) and Pokemon following the same mechanics and story, but also sprucing things up along the way with some new things each gen.  

All I really get from your post is that you simply dislike pokemon and are obsessed with Final Fantasy.