By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zero999 on 14 August 2013
Edit Thread
Anfebious said:
happydolphin said:
Anfebious said:

It has nothing to do but I wanted to point that out . Also the contract wasn't benefiting Nintendo and that's why it was a "backstab"? I don't think it was a backstab just a bussiness decision. It had a catch but so do many contracts.

It was silly of Sony to include that, it's more than a catch that's thievery. It was Nintendo's SNES we're talking about, who the hell was Sony to reserve any rights on Nintendo's games on it?

Ridiculous if you ask me.

It's thievery if Sony does it but when Nintendo took control of Cartrdirge manufacturing in the NES era and forced third party to sign a contract full of restrictions to make games on the system it was perfectly fine.

You know I think both of them are ridiculous if you ask me .

nintendo has the right to do any policies they want on THEIR console, bad as they were. sony making a partnership with another company and stealthly including on the contract that it has full rights for the games released on the pheriferal, that's kinda unethical.