Mythmaker1 said:
Kwaidd said:
Mythmaker1 said:
the_dengle said:
Oh no, Nintendo wants people to enjoy their games. Scandal! |
I think that's kind of what made me lose interest in them the past few years. Nintendo makes very, very fun games, but rarely do they ever step beyond that. And when it comes down to it, I can have just as much fun, and appreciate the artistry to a much greater degree, when I dip into their older titles than their newer ones.
|
So you are saying that the "artistry" in Super Mario 1 or 3 is better than the "artistry" in New Super Mario Bros. Wii or U and therefore more enjoyable? Rarely do they ever step beyond making very, very fun games? What does that mean, don't we all play games for the fun and enjoyment? Stepping beyond that would be making very, very un-fun games, and that would be preferred? What are you really trying to say here? How you are wording it does not make any sense.
|
I'm saying if one is better-designed than the other, then that will show through while playing it. And that the artistry, therefore, is a factor in how much I appreciate and how well I regard a game. Not the only factor, but a factor.
And don't be too quick to equate "fun" and "enjoyment." You can enjoy something because it's fun, but it doesn't have to be fun for one to enjoy it. That's true for anything, and video games are no exception.
|
you are really grasping at straws here. When was the last time anyone enjoyed playing a game that was not fun? Because that is what we are talking about here...games, not a Rembrandt or a Chopin. "I spent 60 dollars on a game and it wasn't even remotely fun, but I really enjoyed it." C'mon.
