By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 on 31 July 2013
Edit Thread
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:

This is exactly what I'm talking about. When you're shown to be wrong, you try to weasel out of it by trying to ignore or discredit the game or developer that shows you're wrong. You can't be trusted to honour a bet because you've shown time and again your inability to accept when you are wrong.


what the heck, i never said every port would be inferior, i said most would, and  most ports are inferior.

When you made the "next 5 multiplats will be inferior" bet, you made no special conditions in your original claim, simply stating that it be the next 5. Then, later,  you added the condition that they had to be simultaneous releases, cos you realized Need for Speed would prove your original claim wrong and you were going to lose the bet.

Funnily enough, that is the kind of bet I'm talking about; a bet with a clear external deciding factor, in the case of the 5 multiplats bet, Digital Foundry. 

If you want people to take a bet, why don't you bet whether Wii U will be inferior to PS3/360 Watchdogs according to Digital Foundry? Then you'll be more likely to get someone to take the bet.