Mr Puggsly said:
Sorry, I'm not being bias. I just I missed that point in your nonsense paragraphs. A $100 price difference is indeed an advantage for PS4. Make your points in fewer words and keep your bias out. Otherwise people will ignore what you say and you just wasted your time. MS is sacrificing the ability to price match the PS4 because they want to push Kinect. They could release a basic game machine like the 360, PS3, or PS4, but clearly they want to do something a little more innovative with Xbox One and Kinect 2. Even if that means PS4 will be the sales leader. |
I didn't have any bias.
I stated before that I believed the 360 and Wii combo was ideal when the gen began because you could skip out on the PS3 by just buying both. In fact I was an advocate of the 'Wii60 combo' when I first got to VGChartz. Stating that you can buy two games with the PS4 for the price of the Xbone by itself without a game is a strength factor.
You can rationalize them tacking on the Kinect all you want, but Kinect will never matter in the grand scheme of things. Sony didnt bother forcing people to use the Move or PS Eye and this is why they will have an advantage. They are leaving it up to the consumers choice. If they support the Move and PS Eye people will buy the products. If they don't support it at least people have the pleasure of knowing they weren't forced to buy a useless product.







