By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HikenNoAce said:


It is hard for me to completely switch off my brain though. If something stupid is happening on screen, that will bother you, right?

Lois was on the ship as collateral for what? Why did they need collateral? She was just on the spaceship because otherwise she wouldn't appear in the movie in the second half.

Advanced AI can see the future too now? Like when she told Lois to move her head to the right?

And even if we manage somehow to look past the plot holes and get over the slow pace of the first, I, personally, got bored of watching the same action sequence for the last quarter of the movie. How many times can we get excited looking at a guy getting punched through a building?

Someone should post that review that highlights everything that was wrong with the movie. It's a youtube video with 3 guys doing a sketch first.

Lois was on the ship because it had already been spread that she knew who Superman was. And was used as collateral in case Superman was going to try anything. Atleast that is what made sense to me.

It was not that it was advanced AI that made hims ee the future. He was INTERGRATED with the ship. So being a part of the ship he sees everything that is going on in the ship and where everyone is. So the ounch was not seen in the future the girl was throwing the punch or in motion and he told her to move her head.

As for the action sequences yeah they did get a little repetitive and went on for a LONG time. So I will give you that much, but evenw itht hose things for a Superman reboot it was not a bad movie at all. People are just nitpicking, which can be done with ANY and every movie and then I guess every movie is bad...for what it was and how they brought Superman back to the big screen they did a very good job.



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23