By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Egann said:
yo_john117 said:
Egann said:

Hunger Games should have ended at the end of the first book. Maybe the movies can salvage things, but I doubt it.

What? Why? Each Hunger Game book got exponentially better than the previous one.

I'm sorry you think that. Book 2 was...OK, I guess. The characters spent a long time talking, Katniss goes from being an empowered survivor to haplessly emoting, but basically it was just a nothing special sequel.

Book 3 was just plain terrible. Katniss has completed the circle and except for two or three decisions in the whole book, she's basically a figurehead of other characters, her narrative presence has long outlived it's charm, and the book as a whole is poorly thought through and even less well researched.

Well; I disagree completely. You're probably one of ten five people in the entire world that thinks each book gets progressively worse. I know there were a bunch of people that loved the third book up until the end then hated it (you either absolutely love the ending, or hate it completely) but most loved the first two books.