By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
forethought14 said:
Locknuts said:

You're right in that there may be more insightful tech people out there, but 352GFLOPS is the number that's being thrown around (as speculation) in those particular sites and so I am assuming (possibly incorrectly, in hindsight) that the people in this thread who are quoting those numbers are taking those numbers as fact. If there is more info out there on the hardware, I'd be very keen to read it but I personally think the better respected GAF and B3D guys have as good an idea as anyone who is not under strict NDA. Like I said, I could be wrong.

I'm not talking of those numbers as fact, but we do know that it does have more raw power than either PS360, so I doubt it will have less than 240, and the shaders are a bit too large for some low number like 20 per cluster. It could be more than that, could be 40, could be 32, could be 56, I just don't know, and those "experts" at GAF or B3D don't want to accept the "I just don't know" reality. Some of them are even posting stuff on GAF like "wow, those graphics look great for GPU with less shaders" (I'm not liking a particular members' attitude towards it, like how he and others are talking like the 160 shaders is a fact). I'm just taking the info as it is from other places, it's likely not the exact number though. Sorry if I made it sound like I took it as fact. 

Just to clarify, I wasn't referring to you in my original post. I was actually referring to Jake_The_Fake1 and the numbers he was using. I probably should have quoted him. I think you and I are actually mostly in agreement.