ethomaz said:
I shadown edited my comment to make more clear. "No studio will fix that disadvantage... Wii U hardware is weak... that is a fact but that was not a big issue for others consoles in the past When you say "great looking games" you need a time comparision... for example I think Donkey Kong Country a great looking game for 1990 but not for 1995. Wii U can make great looking games for 2010 but not for 2014... somethink like that... great Studios won't change that. And graphycs didn't means that the console is goor or bad... if it will have comercial success or not. Edit - TLOU visual are outdated... great looking game for the late PS3 life but outdated for what PS4/Xbone shows... so everybody is asking a PS4 version of the game |
"
i have to partially disagree with your comment. I think the argument is totally dependant on art style. If you take games that go with a realistic art style, such as the mass effect series, then yes; you are completely right. But if you think in terms of alternate art styles such wind waker, sly cooper, metroid prime3 or borderlands, then there is an arguable point to this topic. Depending on your artwork, you can make a game that looks fantasitc, and will still look fantastic decades later. Galaxy was one of the most visually appealing games on the wii-u and , i my opinion, compared with many of the visual powerhouses (at least gameplay graphics wise) from the more powerful competitors. It was weaker hardware still producing a fantasitc looking (although for me an extremely boring) game. But again, will we see titan's fall on wii-u? obviously not.
