By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
student said:
The_vagabond7 said:
You're just trying to be a troll, words of wisdom. If you don't have anything constructive to add to my topic, then I ask you not to post in it.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed it. Every response Words made was basically "Because they SUCK!"


I just find it funny that the official Nintendo-hater line has changed from, "Wii has no third party games!" to, "Wii has third-party games, but they all SUCK!" When what we're really seein is exactly what Nintendo fans predicted all along: a slew of third-party support based around experimental and innovative concepts, while the traditional genres (FPSs, cutscene-heavy RPGs, and so on) go to the HD consoles.

If even 25% of the games that I listed before turn out to be good (and that's not even a complete list), the Wii will still have better third-party exclusives than either of the HD consoles.

 

@ Words of Wisdom: Then what the heck are you saying, bro? Because nobody else in this thread seems to have a clue, other than what we can infer. 



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom