Player1x3 said:
Zero999 said:
JustThatGamer said:
I'm going to say yes because there's some current generation games that blow Bayonetta 2 away visually even if they're not pushing the same framerate and resolution, if they were pared back visually to run at 1080p/60fps they could still look as good or better I think. Project X doesn't really look that amazing either, lovely art direction but looking at Red Dead Redemption or Skyrim does it look a noticeably better? Not really, if it does run at 1080p with a solid 60fps then I guess that would be impressive and I doubt current gen consoles could do that, they could probably render it at 720p/60fps though with enough effort and would look near identical. Anyway, here's some obligatory picture comparisons:
Wii U - 2014.
PS3 - 2010.
PS3/Xbox 360 - 2010.
PS3 - 2013.
Huge scale, gorgeous lighting and beautifully detailed, especially considering they run on 7/8 year old hardware. Also God of War III is the studios first PS3 game and still looks clearly superioir to Bayonetta 2.
|
I'm taking away some images to avoid mega quote.
No, GOW3 is not clearly superior, in fact it's not superior at all. the only impressive things are some enemies, but bear in mind that cronos fight alone cost 1M to develop. the scenarios are pretty lackluster compared to bayonetta2 and they're also mostly closed places vs big open ones at bayonetta.
|
|
honestly comparing those 2 pics, god of war 3 looks nextgen compared to bayonetta 2 but thats why the graphics argument is a waste of time, people see what ever they want to see.
