By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ryuzaki57 said:
MDMAlliance said:
ryuzaki57 said:

I may not necessarily agree with the author's reasons, but you seriously cannot think that 1st parties and 3rd parties are the same thing.  First party games for Nintendo have always been their selling points.  Even if the Wii U had ALL the exclusives on the other consoles, they still wouldn't have had as much of an effect as Nintendo's own first party games in terms of system selling.

Your second point, the 3D Mario and Mario Kart games were technically not games we knew anything about except for the fact that they said "yeah, we will be showing them."  Almost everyone knew they would be coming at some point, they just confirmed the showing at e3.

Clearly you always have something to say, even when it doesn't make much sense to make the comments.

Sorry but the OP was claiming victory for Nintendo at E3, so I do reckon I'm free to disagree with that.

1st or 3rd party, game is a game and each person puts a different costumer value in it. WiiU can have more exclusives of its own than PS4/X1, every 3rd party game that doesn't come to WiiU is a reason for gamers not to pick WiiU. PS4/X1 have a greater advantage in having less exclusives but varied, innovating and technologically superior 3rd party games than WiiU with more exclusives but less variety, lack of innovation and a lesser number of games overall.

There was absolutely no reason for you to say the bolded part considering the italicized part I said.
Also, don't pretend that the gamers you're referring to are the majority of people buying consoles (at least Nintendo ones).
Also, you're throwing around the word "innovation" but there's very little you know about the games coming to the PS4/X1.  You don't know jackshit if it's "innovating" anything beyond "I can see particles."