By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheJimbo1234 on 06 June 2013
Edit Thread
Th3PANO said:
TheJimbo1234 said:
KHlover said:

Devs with an impressive track record, though.

Not really. What new, revolutionary games have they made in recent years? Few, even arguably none. As for hardware, their track record would say that got lucky with the Wii rather than it being their consitsent success when you look at how the N64 and GameCube sold.

Unfortunately their franchises sell always extremely well, even on a lower install base. You can say about Skyward Sword what you want but the graphics style for an  AAA Title was new and revolutionary. Also the first game after years to come that nailed sword movement with a controller (still wasn't perfect, unnecessary motion gaming parts but the swords movement itself was great)


Yes and no. Some do, most don't, and they are proven to not be able to save console sales when we look at previous examples.

Skyward Swords graphics were not new or revolutionary. Why do you think they were as I'm now just a bit confused. Cell shading was huge in the early 2000's, and happy-fluffy-everythings-round-and-bright graphics have been in games for years, the best example being WoW. Limbo was revolutionary, Crysis, Ocorina of Time etc, they all blew everything aprat but no game has done that for a loooong time now.