ironman said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
ironman said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
As I said...Sony is more gamercentric than Microsoft whom is bringing a major corporate lockdown streak to gaming. People who are Microsoft centric want them to be as bad as Microsoft so they can justify and rationalize MS pro-corporate decisions and even if they did screw up, Sony would smarten up to what gamers want. They did it with the PS3 and they continue to follow in the tradition. Sony confirmed since February that DRM wouldn't be included in the console.
|
Absolutely and inequivically wrong. Neither company is "gamecentric", they both are largly invested in other areas. In reality all they care about is how fast they can part the consumer from their hard earned cash, and they clearly have different ideas on how to achive that goal. I really don't understand this blind loyalty to Sony or MS for that matter, it just isn't logical to me.
|
What other areas is Sony majorly investing in outside of games for the console, or actually ever really compared to MS? Try to equate the two and talk to me about logic.
|
Lol, you cannot be serious! Let's see, they do this whole consumer electrinics thing, oh, and they do records and movies...their game department is only a small slice of the money grubbing pie Sony is invested in. My point still stands.
|
Actually the games department has been a bigger chunk of Sony than in the past. Their electronics isnt doing that great these days and they need to stylize their products and lower the price because its not that they dont make it quality stuff, they just make the average consumer pay too much for it when theres other alternatives. When I asked the question about what other areas is Sony majorly focusing on outside of games for the console. I said the console...I am not talking abou the brand. We know MS's major interests are outside of gaming and they made that abundantly clear with the Xboxone, byt trying to undercut Apple & Samsung in one fell swoop. That is the definition of spreading yourself thin.
