| Otakumegane said: Not sure about 6, but at least 5 should've been on the Wii. Resi 4 sold well on the Wii. |
Should have, but it wasnt.
| Conegamer said: That was purely a power issue (apparantly); something which the Wii U doesn't have to worry about as much. If the Wii could play 5 or 6, it would. Because every other Resident Evil game is avaliable on Nintendo platforms, so 7 also being on the Wii U seems highly likely (if not certain). |
And what if RE7 is actually a game thats pushing PS4 and Nextbox?
| Pavolink said: And yet Revelations port is even on Wii U. |
A port of a 3DS game doesnt mean much, especially if RE7 is a PS4/Nextbox game. Would be like saying RE5/RE6 would have been on Wii because a RE4 port was.
| Mr Khan said: Where, i should note, it is more redundant than on PS3 or 360, as there's more likely to be cross-platform ownership between current Wii U owners and 3DS owners who were likely to buy Revelations. |
I dont think this means anything at all. If RE Revelations sells less on Wii U than on PS360, it will have nothing to do with the 3DS version. It will have more to do with the userbase size and the RE fanbase on PS360. Revelations will be a good way to get some fanbase for the series on Wii U, but using a Revelations port as an excuse for why RE7 should/will be on Wii U is really silly.
I mean, Capcom put a Monster Hunter port on PS3 and one on 360. It meant nothing.
Essay Pro