Player1x3 said:
KungKras said:
Player1x3 said:
KungKras said:
Player1x3 said:
curl-6 said:
Jay520 said:
curl-6 said:
Jay520 said:
No, he probably didn't decide to have a baby. BUT he did make the decision to take part in an activity which had a high risk of him being a parent. He took a risk, so he should be prepared to accept the consequences of this risk.
Just because society is fucked up and people treat sex like a game doesn't mean it isn't serious and people shouldn't have to pay the consequences. That's a weak argument. |
This isn't the stone age, sex and procreation are no longer one and the same. There's nothing "fucked up" about having sex for fun.
|
Sure, you can treat sex like a fun little game if you want, by its fucked up if you don't take responsibility when the real and serious consequences result. Just because you partake in an activity for fun, doesn't mean you shouldn't take responsibility for the consequences of that activity |
What's fucked up is parenthood being forced on someone.
|
You can always give your child to an adoption system. What's REALLY fucked up is denying someone's chance to live a human life because you're an irresponsible cowardly fucktard (regardless of gender)
|
An un-sentient clump of cells is not "someone"
|
These types of posts make me wanna vomit.
Those ''clump of cells'' are a developing human being. Their sentiment is being developed inside the womb (if it's lucky enough not to be killed by the likes of you)
|
Who cares if it has the same genome as a human, it doesn have a brain, so it does not experience anything. It's not developed into a person yet, so it shouldn't get treated as a person.
I love how you seem to think that you're the most moral person, yet in a different thread, you voiced your approval of people beating up gays. So doing that to a real person with a real consiousness is ok to you, but not aborting an un-sentient fetus?
|
Hahaha, you're really not in the position to call anyone on 'holier than thou' attitude.
So by your marvellous logic it's also ok to kill a person in coma because he won't experience anything. It's developing INTO A human, and by killing it, you're denying it a chance to live a human life, and thus my previous statement. No one should have the right to decide whether or not someone should get a chance at life. Abortion is a sickening, disgusting immoral murder.
And where did i ever say i approve of beating up gays? I've witnessed a gay dude getting beat up, it was pretty bad
|
I assumed that you approved of it in the european country poll thread with this comment " Hahaha lol. It was kinda similar here in Serbia lol. Thats what they get for not listening to the public and the majority (I assume Georgians were also against having a parade)" But I may have misinterpreted it.
There is a very important distinction between abortion and killing someone in a coma. With some people, the brain is still active, even though they aren't 'awake'. An old relative of mine got a heart attack, and was unconciouss for a few days, but when he woke up, he could remember what the doctors around him had talked about. People in comas have had consiousness, and if they would some day wake up, they would probably experience a continued conciousnes. Personally, the only time that I'm in favour of dropping life support is when it can be proven that all brain cells are dead. Early fetuses have never been concious, and have never had a brain to be concious with. It's a totally different situation.
