Mythmaker1 on 10 May 2013
Too much qualification. The article is bending over backwards to prove a point that no one cares about.
And then it just throws a whole bunch of figures together at the end, often with rough and unsuitable comparisons, in order to try and prove another point.
There's nothing profound here, or even anything that really proves the basic premise of the piece.
I believe in honesty, civility, generosity, practicality, and impartiality.
