sieanr said:
I wasnt aware people took IGNs reviews seriously. It has a 79.7% at gamerankings. Just for the record Killzone PS2 had 73.2%, so it did improve, but not enough to justify the hype for 3. The game did have excellent art direction, but is that really enough to save a developer who cant impliment jumping in an FPS? Please refrain from this "technical limitation" bullshit yet plenty of developers made amazing games within the confines of the PS2. Perhaps the developer just cant make a game to go along with their vision. And if they overshot things on the PS2, whos to say they wont do the same on the PS3? Like I said, this is all sony generated hype - what other game sees this much excitment when its only had a fake CGI trailer released? |
Hey here's an idea why don't you stop being a fanboy. killzone on the ps2 was hampered by technical limitations and with the ps3 they won't have that problem anymore. Yes many developers made good games for the ps2 but how many developers made tripple AAA fps games for the ps2, the answer is none. The hype is deserved unlike yet another mario party or mario strikers game that has yet again scored poorly but will still sell over a million each thanks to fanboys and the same goes for the xbox360 with whatever 'it' game of the month comes out like lost planet, saints row and perfect dark zero, the fanboys flock to it to get their achievements







