By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EricFabian said:
kain_kusanagi said:
But none of that is why I was aggravated with people's responses to this timeline. All it's getting is "My fav game isn't on it so it fails". It's not a book on the history of video games, it's a short overview.

 


short overview from Microsoft btw. Even you should able to see that

WTF is that supposed to mean?


You're looking at this all wrong. It's not a list of top video game stuff. It's a timeline. It just illustrates how things have changed over time. It's about where it started and how far it's come. MS has 2 entries plus 1 seperate shared bullet point on a timeline with 23 main entries and 47 bullet points. That's a total of 10 MS mentions out for 70 possible. That comes to 14%. This timeline is 14% MS which is clearly not overwelmingly bias. If I made the timeline it probably would have more Sony and it would deffinitly have more Nintendo, Sega, and Atari. But like I said it's not a list of best gaming stuff. It's a timeline to illustrate an evolution.