Mazty said:
So instead of answering simple questions you'd rather avoid it and then mock it....Claiming a game is original and then not being able to defend that claim is pretty attrotious dude. |
Your definition of "original" makes it seem like no game past the first game ever created can be considered original, because there's always something that's being copied. Tsk tsk.
You're basically saying "Derp, this game requires eyes to see it, therefore it is unoriginal. Just a copy of pong."








