These journalists couldn't stop smiling at Nintendo's fate

[happydolphin]

Otakumegane said:

RicardJulianti said:
It's funny to me that people claim that Nintendo doesn't have any third party support....when that simply isn't true. They have far more confirmed developers than they do ones that aren't outright supporting them.

Crytek, Capcom, Ubisoft, TT Games, WB, Square Enix, Criterion, Atlus, Namco Bandai, Sega, Platinum and Indie devs popping up left and right; versus EA (minus Criterion), Deep Silver, Epic (UE3 support only), and CD Projekt RED.

Anyone else is pure speculation on either side of the argument until E3 is said and done. There are almost no games announced for next-gen consoles anyway so it is a little early to say that they won't have any third party support. This is a fairly old article, but it definitely tells where the industry is headed. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-10-24-lost-humanity-18-a-table-of-doritos

Crytek-EA making sure WiiU never gets games, even though Crysis ran on WiiU.

Capcom-MH3U is a port. So is Resident Evil:R

Ubisoft-Ok yeah this one's decnet.

Square Enix-Deus Ex director's cut. Pretty much a dang port. DQX also a port.

Criterion-Port NFSMW

Platinum-You do realize Nintendo bought these guys for the games.

Bamco-Tank!Tank!Tank tanked. 

Sega-Sonic sells well on Nintendo consoles. Actually there are people that don't know Sega isn't a Nintendo character.

Everyone else-UE4. Pretty much that.

This is a bad post.

First of all, you don't judge support based on whether a game failed or not (I assume you were making a joke then for Tank! Tank! Tank!).

Second, Sega isn't a character, and whether Sega-Sonic sells on Nintendo consoles doesn't change the fact that the support is there.

Third, Nintendo didn't buy Platinum games.

Fourth, you didn't tackle Atlus, TT Games, Indies.

And lastly, a port is at least a game, so there is support albeit minor. The lists he gave were reasonable and the contrast was pretty clear with those that offer _no_ support.