"For those of you that think Capcom is REALLY behind the Wii, here's a quote from Christian Svensson, Capcom's Vice-President of Strategic Planning & Business Development:
Christian Svensson asks to "spread the Okami gospel across the net, my sons and daughters." and we have complied. He also said in regard to the good sales from the Resident Evil games that "all of you Wii fanatics better have Okami pre-ordered by now because that's the next test (and it's waaay better with Wii controls, than it was on PS2... it's very different, in a good way)." We'll keep you posted."
**
If they weren't behind the Wii (despite you using the vague term "REALLY behind"), there would be no testing that he indicated. They would just throw shovelware and throw up their hands when it doesn't sell, the way Konami seems to be.
---------------------
"Honestly, why can't Nintendo have some sort of quality control?"
**
Did you not pay attention the DOZEN TIMES this thread brought up Nintendo's past quality control, and how it BACKFIRED?
You are either stupid or trolling, for not putting two an two together.
Quality control requires telling developers how to make their games. If you think developers will stand for that, you are DELUSIONAL.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
