I just wanted to note to the guys arguing about the PS2 library that it had about 2700 games so if the top 200 games are worth playing like one of you said that would be about 13% of the games are actually worth playing.
Alot of people mentioned the NES too for nintendos quality control, and out of the 700 games for that system(not including unlicensed games because nintendo had no control over those what so ever) only about 50-80 were worth playing depending on your tastes. I think it was more about making sure the games were coming out for a nintendo console rather than making sure the games had great quality.
But like a lot of others have mentioned previously the Wii has no more or no less shovelware than the NES, Genesis, PS, PS2, Xbox, or PC in my opinion.
Also since when do reviewer scores actually correspond with the quality of a game. its all about taste. I thought Warioware was fun but after me and my wife finished it we havnt touched it. There is no replay value to the game and it only took about 3 hours to unlock pretty much everything. Reviewers gave that game scores in the high 80s and low 90s. We would have given it probably a mid 60 score. I think this goes for a lot of gamers wether they are new to gaming or been gaming for the last 20+ years.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
