is ps3 actually selling better than 360?

[exclusive_console]

nightsurge said:

Jay520 said:
Good sir, I've never seen any user on VGChartz with those ideas you've just proposed. I'm not sure why no one has thought of this before. Thank you for informing us of this new news. I salute you.

Love it.

 

And to anyone on here that says there is no comparison of PS3 YLOD to the 360's RROD, consider the following:

 

• Do you know of ANYONE that still has a 60GB launch PS3 that HAS NOT had to be repaired at least once? - I don't.
• 360 RRoD: Covered by 3 year warranty
• PS3 YLOD: Not covered by any warranty. Repairs at $100+ each failure.

I think if the YLOD was actually brought to the media's attention on the same scale as the 360's RRoD, you'd be suprised at the high failure rate of launch PS3's as well. Like others have said, the fact that MS covered theirs with a warranty while Sony never did makes the differences cancel out when it comes to the old "I bought a new console when my old one broke" arguments.

 

Not sure if serious or just stupid.

PS3 failure rate is normal 360 was obviously not.

360 was a defective console. They were selling defective console for years. It was bound to fail. 3 yrs warranty - they were forced to do so and lost around 2billion $. But had no option because of so many law suits against them on court for selling a known defective console. So they were going to be forced anyways to provide compensation for it. Also it would be humiliating for them and no one would trust or buy it anymore

~Mod Edit~

This post has been moderated.

-Smeags