Carl2291 said:
Mazty said:
Carl2291 said:
The 360 is more successful.
Sold more.
Made more money.
Sold more software.
Increase in sales and marketshare over last generation.
|
Sold more? Not when you compare it to a week by week basis. Ignoring the year lead is arbitrary.
Made more money? Really? How much did fixing the RROD cost exactly? Considering it's failure rate was around the region of ~50%, that would cost a shit load. We need to see net profit.
Since when was software sold indicitive of how the console sold? Arbitrary rule.
Yes the increase in sales and marketshare is indeed positive for the 360, but hardly negative for the PS3...That's like saying because Bolt won the 100m sprint that's a victory for him and a loss for everyone else...
|
Rather than pointlessly arguing against your... Erm... Points. Im gonna ask you a question. And everyone else here too.
Can you put forward an argument for how the PS3 has been more successful than the 360 over the entire generation? Yes, the entire generation. From the day the 360 launched.
|
It has almost the exact same market share yet launched a year later....Week on week that means it's sales have been higher, whilst also securing the next-gen format. Now go figure if MS want to use bluray, with every nextbox sold Sony will make cash. That seems like a brilliant move.
