PS4 not worth the cost says Nvidia (Read thread, not title)

[kain_kusanagi]

theprof00 said:

kain_kusanagi said:

Good grief man.
I don't think I've ever seen anyone go to such lengths to intentionally misinterpret another's words as you have.  What I've said is so simple that I'm actually impress that you've been able to reverse its meaning. I'm starting to think you are just being contrarian.

Let's start over. Forget everything you and I have said on the subject so we can stop arguing about semantics and get back to the point.

Ok? I'll start.

I say the headline is fine and anyone that finds it sensational is jumping to the wrong conclusions. What do you say about that? And please don't tell me in length again why you think I've been saying anything else.

Just for fun, I'll make it even simpler.

Title no hurt me. Why title hurt you? J/K ;)

I think it is purposely written to be more sensational than it actually is.

Saying "PS4 is not worth the cost", is different from saying "manufacturing for consoles was seen as an opportunity cost".

The two say very different things. The OP title, CAN be interpreted as the latter, but it takes a big leap to get there because it leaves out important information.

 

Now, to answer your second really eye-rollingly belittling question, the title no hurt me. I was making a joke that you and cgi pretty much have the same point of view, with the only difference being you were criticizing cgi.

So we're starting over, is this going to repeat itself? I imagine your response is simply going to be "if you were (careful to not use the word misled) mistaken, that is your fault". I don't see a resolution to this, Kain. It's very straightforward.

Now that's a statement of opinion I can agree to disagree with!

BTW. Sorry if you found my joke belittling. I though it was cute. It was in jest so I hope you weren't actualy offended.

I think we have beaten this dead horse enough. See you around in other topics. I'm kind of done with this one.