theprof00 said:
kain_kusanagi said:
theprof00 said:
You don't even know what we were arguing about kain. Continuing it is not something I'd find entertaining.
Ps: I never said your interpretation was wrong, just that the idea that your interpretation is the clearest one is wrong. You even admit to this by saying a title that is still technically right is not misleading. |
I think you're just embarrassed that the headline upset/confused you and what that says about you. With all due respect of course.
P.S. The "Quote" and "Reply" buttons are there for you to use. It makes it a lot easier for those you converse with to find your replies. Typing into the "Quick Reply" box doesn't alert anyone specifically that you have engaged them in conversation.
|
I'm just talking the facts. I compared yours and cgi's post, saying that you were saying the same thing.
You in turn said, the title is not misleading.
I said that that would make you objectively wrong.
You've since admitted that being 'technically accurate' isn't misleading.
That's the very definition of misleading, to lead someone to an inorrect conclusion purposely.
You say if a person is misled it is their own fault, not the title, and the title not misleading.
There really is no argument here. There is you being wrong, and me being right. I wish we could both be right, but sadly this is an objectively one-sided contest.
|
You misunderstood the clearly not retail headline.
Then you misunderstood my first post.
Then you misunderstood my reply to yours. I tried to say it in a nice way by seeing it from your "misleading" side, but again you took that to mean something else.
You've since willingly refused to see reason.
You are right about one thing. There is no argument. There's you jumping to conclusions and me pointing it out. I wish you could see the light, but sadly you can't get past your initial misinterpretations.
