ghettoglamour said:
ils411 said:
ghettoglamour said:
Lol, I'm proud PS3 owner, don't need and 360. That been said...who gives a fuck about average scores and shitty games?
The only thing that matters is how many good games a console has.
If console X has 50 games you want (good scores) and 600 games you don't want (bad scores) and console Y has 45 good games and 5 bad games....
Which console has the better average? Which console is more interesting to you?
|
you lost me there, if X has 50 games that I want, and Y has only 45 good games, despite it only having 5 bad games and X has 600 bad games, then its a no brainer. X all the way since it has 5 more good games that I want and the 600 nasty games are always good for a few laughs especially if those games are in the bargain bin.
|
Right, but console Y would have a much higher average score, which is what this thread is about. I just wanted to point out how pointless this thread is.
|
That is what I'm saying after every yearly Metacritic report.
Unless someone points a gun in your face and forces you to play all the shitty games, an average Metascore of all games on a platform is completely irrelevant.
The quanitity of good games is all that matters. And if that number is very high, you probably won't notice the difference as you can't play all these games anyway.
