fordy said:
PullusPardus said:
fordy said:
Turkish said:
fordy said:
Turkish said:
fordy said:
Turkish said:
pezus said:
fordy said:
PullusPardus said:
fordy said:
Looks pretty clunky, especially when compared to today's slim ultrabooks. |
how is it clunky?
|
It looks tremendously thick compared to the Sandy Bridge architecture in ultrabooks. Take the Samsung Series 9 for example...
|
wat. How does it look thick?
|
Don't even bother, the Tablet Z is the thinnest 10" tablet, the guy obviously has an agenda as has is recent posts has shown, or he just has bad eyes.
|
Source?
By the way, there are ultrabooks thinner than this
|
It comes straight from the horse's mouth. Which ultrabook is thinner?
|
I already gave the Series 9 as an example, but I wouldn't be suprised if reports come back that Surface is thinner, since it seemed like the only tablet on the market who even came close to the Series 9 in terms of sleekness.
|
Samsung Series 9
12.3" (W) x 8.6" (H) x 0.50" (D)
Xperia Tablet Z:
10.47 x 6.77 x 0.27 inches
Please stop spreading bullshit misinformation.
|
How thick is the keyboard attachment? You're only using the screen dimensions.
To top this off, the Tablet Z uses a low performance ARM, which is nowhere near the same league as the Core i7 Sandy Bridge.
|
Okay, so you say we should compare ultrabooks to tablets, then say we shouldn't compare them with tablets?
make up your mind already.
Series 9 doesn't even have that good of a CPU , my laptop which is from 2011 has a i7 2.20 > 3.30 GHz , and its not even a high end PC, and it is 2k cheaper than the "Premium" Series 9 Samsung
It also supports full HD resolution which is by today should be a standard, while the series 9 sports a 1600 x 900
I could go on and on , but in short, that laptop is overpriced, but Samsung knows whos buying and people who buy it are the Galaxy fans with no computer knowledge, they are acting like Apple.
|
You can compare them if you like, but you'll either have to discount the keyboard size for the Series 9 or add the keyboard size for the Tablet Z.
Series 9 Has a very decent CPU for its size. Of course it doesn't rival desktops and the like, that's just ridiculous, but compared to the ARM range, it's a completely different league altogether. By the way, my premium Series 9 costed $1300, so unless you got paid $700 for your computer upgrade, I'm not buying it.
The screen is really the only thing that can be criticised, and it was a matter of tossing up between the 1080 screen on the ASUS Zenbook, or the size/power factor of the Series 9.
Of course, this is an old ultrabook now, at least 6 months old, so there's probably even better around in the merket.
|
Me : " my laptop which is from 2011"
You : " Of course, this is an old ultrabook now, at least 6 months old,"
You : "Series 9 Has a very decent CPU for its size"
Me : "My laptop from 2011, and has a better CPU, , the one on the S9 is very close to a smartphone one"
now I have no idea what you are getting at, at this point.
also , You bought yours for less than 1 K ? was it a discount? , because the ones that are less than 2k are not "Premium" models, and my phone has a better CPU than those crappy things.
by the way the Zenbook is a lot more powerful than the Series 9 , so i think you picked the wrong one for just a couple of milimeters thiner.
