By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
happydolphin said:
IsawYoshi said:

I let the thought grow for a minute :D

It looks cool, and could be really revolutionary. The question really is how expencive it is. I didn't hear that they said any price for this stuff, but if it is at a repectable  price, then I really think these guys have stuck gold. 

Hehe, you punny.

Well, with a piece of graphene oxide the size of a stamp and what a tenth of a milimeter thin, they were able to power a led for 5 minutes. By comparison, the iphone 3G battery has these dimensions:

115.5 x 62.1 x 12.3 mm = 88.222 cubic cm

In comparison this graphene oxide sheet used was

30 x 25 x 0.1 mm = 75 cubic mm

So, with the graphene oxide sheet fit into an iphone 3G battery, you could power

88,222/75 = 1176 LEDs for 5 minutes.

Anyone good in electrical science can compare the wattage of LEDs to the wattage of iPhones? Anyways I'll try.

From yahoo answers:

Low current LED's go down to 1mA at 1.8V (red) for their rated output, which is 1.8V * 0.001A = 2mW or 0.004W.

1176 LEDs would consume 4.7W

What is the wattage of an iPhone?

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4971/apple-iphone-4s-review-att-verizon/15

Power Consumption Comparison
  Apple iPhone 4 (AT&T) Apple iPhone 4S (AT&T)
Idle 0.7W 0.7W
Launch Safari 0.9W 0.9W
Load AnandTech.com 1.0W 1.1W
Maps (Determine Current Location via GPS/WiFi) 1.3W 1.4W

Let's go with 1.3W for the iphone.

4.7W / 1.3W = 3.61

From these newb calculations, it looks like the graphene oxide battery would be 3.61 times as efficient as the current iPhone battery.

The cost? Well at 1500$-3000$ per metric ton which si then diluted into a base solution (not sure the cost on that) and repeatedly applied to dirt cheap CDs, this can't be costly I don't think.

Rather impressive I must say. Well, if they manage to combine those two things they were talking about in the video. That is yet to be seen.