Mazty said:
IsawYoshi said:
No, my point is that more people would have bought those games if they were just as good as their counterpart on other consoles and not have gotten an triology including the same game released a few days befor itself that costed less than the standalone game. I did not say in my original post that ea would earn money on the wii u if they put more effort into it, but they certainly would have sold more copies. And that would meen that they could look at it and say: Hmm, the nuber of people owning this console, and the amount of games sold doesn't look too bad, if we give this platform a year, and a bit of faith, and we might just have an viable platform.
|
Would they have? How many people have actually taken the time to read the digital foundary tech breakdowns?
The issue isn't the quality of games, it's that the games don't offer anything new enough to warrant buying an entire console. If you already have a 360 or PS3, why get a Wii U when you can just get it for your other console which also has all your friends on?
The Wii U, as far as I'm concered, was DOA due to it not offering a big enough improvement over the existing consoles at the end of those consoles life span.
|
Yeah, ofcource more would have bought them if they had exlusive content.
