Hawk said:
I hope I am not one of these diehard fans you speak of ;). Sure a better solution should be called for. But valid arguements should be used. Such as pezus mentioning what if the Wii U was stolen? Because thats a good question and valid concern. Or where ECM seems to be saying he had trouble in the middle of the transfer. I see that being a problem as well. Or just the plain inconvienece of the process to customers. But this instance of 'Jon' blatanlty ignoring warnings and proper process to retain his $400 of digital content and then loosing that digital content and whining about it, that is fully his own fault. The fact that he'd have to wait a period of time to get access to his content if he followed the proper process is a valid arguement for a better solution. And that the whole process of propably having to ship it to Nintendo is inconvienent is an arguement. But 'Jon''s loss of $400 of digital content is his own fault. |
A shoddy policy and account management model is still shoddy, though, not to mention an awful way to run a business. If you open an account with a bank and find out when you get your statement that they were charging you fees that no one else in the banking industry does, you should probably say, "yeah, I should have read the fine print," but you should ALSO say, "this sucks," regardless. I mean, this is a next gen system, shouldn't we demand better?
I'm not saying people should boycott, or anything like that, but customers need to tell businesses what they like and dislike. The Wii U should have shipped with better.








