TheBardsSong said:
It doesn't have to be a successor to an existing console or a significant upgrade to be considered part of a new generation. The PC-Engine was a successor to no previous console, and was technically an 8-bit machine released alongside several 16-bit machines. It's considered a part of the 4th generation alongside the SNES/Genesis/Neo Geo, is it not? Explain your point. |
The PC-Engine may have had an 8bit CPU, but it's 16bit graphics chip was FAR more advanced than the NES and Master System and leaps and bounds more advanced than the Atari 7800. I own them all and a Turbo Duo which is the CD system version of the TG-16.
I can tell you from experience that the PC-Engine is a significant upgrade from the NES and Master System. It just isn't as big of a leap as the Genesis and SNES. With each generation the upgrades have become more noticeable. Back in the 80's the generational leaps were all 2D and difficult for many to tell the difference. But I can give testament to the TG-16's graphical and audio abilities and it does deserves to be part of the 16bit generation based on its graphical abilities.








