| TruckOSaurus said:
You side-stepped my point. Let's say you consider Movie A and Movie B to be equally enjoyable and entertaining, why do you care that one cost 200millions to make and the other 2million? |
Trucks, I didn't side-step it. If you look closely, you're making the same point as Nikkom. In this case, the 200m$ costing movies are under-priced because otherwise they would never sell. Like he was saying they should be sold at 50$ a ticket, that would never work. Instead, they mark it down to increase volume.
Ironically enough, that's what I was telling you regarding a markdown of these Nintendo games. Sadly your point on HW is a good one, and though it could boost HW sales, Nintendo's HW strategy does not warrant apple-like or tablet-like sales. It's too niche I'm afraid.
RolStoppable said:
Why? |
I have honestly never played it, but it is my understanding that it does not have the same quality value as Galaxy does. As such, Nintendo offered a much higher-caliber product at a much more reasonable cost.
I heard that Epic Mickey 2 had a lot of bugs, and its metacritic is very low.
