| NintendoPie said:
I think, in the case of the Wii, they helped each other out. The Wii had a new thing going for it (Motion Controls) and, as we all know, SW sells HW. So, put two and two together and you get quite large sales. Period. What I don't get is you trying to imply that these games aren't quality. I think Immortal has told you (and others) that quality is, basically, left up to the buyer of the game, not one sole individual. If that were true then you would be right, but it's far from true. |
This is what immortal actually said , that game sales don't indicate quality, but perceived value:
| Immortal said:
Words we all tend to forget all too often. Regardless, even if you don't want to acknowledge that quality is subjective, whoever was it that said that quality has anything to do with pricing? It has something to do with the value an average consumer sees in the product, but nothing whatsoever to do with "quality" as you or I or any other individual sees it. |
Other than that, well, Wii sold the games, which sold more Wiis, fair enough. But then the failure of those game to sell 64s and cubes paints a different picture than what you're saying, that the games themselves are worthy of their sales. It would seem that if that were the case, they would have sold on either the 64/cube or the Wii. But they didn't.
