ishiki said:
007BondAgent said:
ishiki said:
007BondAgent said:
ishiki said:
007BondAgent said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:
007BondAgent said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:
bonkers555 said:
NO, Pokemon is Nintendo most valuable franchise.
|
Apart from a couple spikes in 2006 and 2010, the franchise has been in decline since the groundbreaking sales of the first two generations. Also, the highest selling console game, while a huge success, didn't break six million units sold. Compare that to Mario Kart or Super Mario.
|
black and white is tracking ahead of dp, and how can the series be on a decline, when ruby and sapphire exists?
pokemon is only growing, face it :)
|
Pokemon 1998: 31.27
Pokemon 1999: 23.10
Pokemon 2002: 15.85
Pokemon 2004: 10.49
Pokemon 2006: 18.04
Pokemon 2009: 11.48
Pokemon 2010: 14.59
Pokemon 2012: 6.16 (so far)
If we trust the VGChartz numbers, then there is decline. It's still a monster of a franchise, but it's not growing very much.
|
u have got to be kidding me. http://mynintendonews.com/2013/01/30/pokemon-black-white-2-have-sold-over-7-5-million-worldwide/
|
Pokemon is definetely not growing when the sales haven't come close to the first generation...
|
it grew in this generation though, so it did grow.
|
Okay fine you're being nonsensical and missing the point. I'll rephrase
Pokemon's main franchise is smaller than it was in Red/Blue/Yellow by a lot. So the Main franchise is not the biggest it's ever been.
|
ohh for the love of god. did i ever say that? i'm just saying it's growing, which it is,
|
Within this gen it's gotten smaller every release. Diamond/Pearl sold more than Black/White which will sell more than Black/White 2.
|
Black/White 2. isn't main game.. for the love of god, you should be comparing it to platinum, and Black/White is tracking ahead of dp... fail
