By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kaizar on 02 February 2013
Edit Thread
ninjablade said:
Kaizar said:

 

ninjablade said:
Neogaf is doing a gpu tear down, they paid chips work 200$ to do the job, so we will no if wii u is weaker or stronger then current gen soon.


100% of Named 3rd Party Devs say it is a minimum of 150% as powerful graphics then the PS3.

 

They have the Dev Kit to all video game systems you know?

But I have come across a lot of users who choose to go in denial about what all Named 3rd Party Devs have said about Home & Handheld Consoles.

 

So please just listen to the "Named" 3rd Party Devs, instead of other users on the Internet........Trust Me.

tecmo, vigil, all claim it's on par, not to mention metro last light which cancelled the wiiu version after looking at the dev kit, claiming the cpu was too weak.


Well, those 3rd parties make their engines differently from almost all others.

For instance; Metro fully relies on the CPU only for its games, the Metro engine does not use neither GPU nor RAM for any & all of their games, but is made for modern graphics, LOL. So to run Metro at 100% capacity, you would need next Gen PCs. It's clearly an Engine made by people who know the littlest about how video games run since the 1990'sfor crying out loud.

 

Long story short, you choose bad 3rd party engines for your example, especially Metro, which is the most ignorant engine made in the 21st Century that I can think of.