| xwan said:
What??? "Un-decomposed tissue found by submerging fossils in acid, which no other scientist has done before" = "Human and dinos walked the earth together"? Those two things do not equate, now that's a huge logic problem. |
As I said, it hasn't decomposed. That's all that matters.
"After all, as any textbook will tell you, when an animal dies, soft tissues such as blood vessels, muscle and skin decay and disappear over time, while hard tissues like bone may gradually acquire minerals from the environment and become fossils. Schweitzer, one of the first scientists to use the tools of modern cell biology to study dinosaurs, has upended the conventional wisdom by showing that some rock-hard fossils tens of millions of years old may have remnants of soft tissues hidden away in their interiors."
Maybe that's because it isn't tens of millions of years old, just maybe?
Continued from the article, her testimonial of the first sighting:
“I looked at this and I looked at this and I thought, this can’t be. Red blood cells don’t preserve.”
