By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Gballzack on 31 May 2007
Edit Thread
Poseidon said:
Gballzack said:
Poseidon said:
Gballzack said:

I'm simply the voice of reason here, at worst, the Devil's Advocate. The only thing to suggest bias in this thread is to think a price drop is even possible in the first place.

The burden of proof lies on who makes the initial positive claim and that is those in this thread suggesting a price drop is even possible. You don't make the initial statement ask them for proof when they question it, that's not how it works.


Yes, the voice of reason and the only thing being biased is this thread, and not the member whose reasoning is based on her bias towards a company.

F'n genius.


Your claims to the contrary are unsubstantiate and baseless, perhaps you'd like to offer some meat to the matter. I merely entered this thread to point out the obvious regardless my previous dispositions and have done nothing to show my own distain for the company in any of my posts here.


Listen giril, I have caught your ludicrous and ridiculous arguments and claims towards Sony in the past. This thread had arguments of why there might be one soon, why there won't be one in the not too distant future, and a few provided reasoning as to why they should, should not, will, and won't.

You did that....to a degree. This just made me turn my crooshairs to your attention:

"Stop kidding yourselves, a price drop isn't going to happen."

"No, they don't have a choice, they can't drop the price."

Any evidence that it is truly a fact that they are indeed locked in a "chicken-wing" and can't maneuver there way out of the jam they currently are in? 


Once again you're crying fire where there is no smoke, and its somewhat sad you're reduced to arguing my intentions because you simply can't argue the validity of the points I've brought up. If I'm really being biased shouldn't it be easy to argue down my points? This wasn't an issue of biased or unbiased until you showed up. And the topic was quite on tract too before hand as well.