RolStoppable said:
Regarding your taking away the QB comment, you could say that about a lot of teams. Or in Minnesota's case, you could say that they would be pretty crappy without their RB. But that's still a better situation to be in than teams that are already pretty crappy before you take away their best player. Like, you know, the Bears. |
Rol, the Bears went 10-6 this year with an awful coach. That is not a crappy record. If you took Aaron Rodgers off of the Packers for an entire year, I am willing to bet the farm that their record would be much worse than that. Let's not talk about that though. Let's talk about the Packers on Saturday. They gave up 180 something yards rushing to a QB. The 0-16 Lions never did that, the 0-14 Bucs never did that, and the Bears never did that. No one has ever done that. Now that is crappy.
Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD
Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."
"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units." High Voltage CEO - Eric Nofsinger
