Mensrea on 15 December 2012
| VGKing said: I like how Nintendo fans argue how this is such a huge victory or something. But Bayonetta didn't even sell that much on PS3/360. What makes you think it will be more successful on a Nintendo console? Sure Nintendo is publishing it so that could give it more recognition, but this is a sequel to a game most Wii U owners have never played. This is probably a game that can bring over some PS3/360 owners, but not by itself. If Nintendo wants to get the "core" gamer then they need to more stuff like this. Bayonetta 2 isn't enough. In reply to the OP: Sleeping Dogs was moderately successful on PS3/360. I don't think Square Enix would need help publishing the game, and they wouldn't abandon the audience which made it successful in the first place. So Sleeping Dogs 2 exclusive to Wii U is out of the question. Anything Sega related? What successful IP has Sega had this generation? Bayonetta has a lot of potential, but this leads back to what I wrote above. Sonic isn't what it used to be, and an making it exclusive would essentially be competing with Mario,which Nintendo would be stupid to do. |
We're not saying it is a huge victory, no one is claiming that buying Bayo 2 was the messia that would save the Wii U. All I said was that games like this build goodwill between Nintendo fans, and help make the Wii U a more attractive buy. With a few more of these, they could really seperate themselfs from their competitors.
