| JayWood2010 said:
So which is better selling one game or multiple games and accessories? That is what it comes down to. What is more important, selling your 1st party game or cutting into its profits and maximizing all software and hardware. |
I'd say bold.
I completely agree that they are an investment, I think the question in the end that OP was trying to ask (among other things >.>) was, are Sony selling their properties short by bundling them.
Here is an analogy from the auto world. We know that Mercedes are great cars, and they're made with quality labor and parts. Sure. But Mercedes set the market price of their cars, and that's what people pay. They could set the price lower, would people still buy it? Would it affect the perceived value of the product.
I'm not saying Sony is doing that, I'm just asking the question, and it seems OP was also indirectly asking that, especially given the mention of rebate prices.
I agree that the title is a little odd "to get games into million sellers list" is no companies business, I wouldn't think. Companies are always after the bottomline (e.g. profit). But I think it's a fair question to ask, is Sony underselling its games by selling at a lower value than what they're worth?
Then you have the whole question of Supply and demand, and if you offer a product at a more affordable price, you will have more supply and more sales, but you may also decrease the deman for your product by trimming off its perceived value.







