happydolphin on 28 November 2012
| Relias said: Aahhh the good olde days when I would walk in to Gamestop and hear about how my system sucked.. because it was not Microsoft certified.. and all the arguments that happened.. I guess I should not be surprised it still goes on.. Anyway about the article.. Personally I think if your XBOX broke down.. maybe you should have got a new one.. I also believe that if you felt so strongly that The PS3 is such a let down maybe it's time for a trade in and New XBOX 360.. Honestly.. making it sound like someone forced fed you a PS3.. then saying I like the new exclusives(Or certain ones anyway) is almost enough to make your argument Invalid.. but what does make your opinion/ argument invalid.. is your not really complaining so much about exclusive titles (He does but only a little really) But your bringing up issues about 3rd party companies.. you don't need to lose faith in the Sony.. you need to lose faith (and the developers of such games a "valued customer") in the developers who are making those games. |
I thought about this, and though I think the 3rd parties are responsible for the weaker versions of the ports, ultimately the onus was on Sony to make a platform that was more dev-friendly than MS'. Ultimately MS won 3rd party appeal, and as such, won the optimization war against Sony's PS3. The result is, generally, 3rd party multiplats are better suited on the 360.
As for the Author's opinion, it just feels completely biased, actually it reeks of bias. But the reactions in here are just immature.
