F0X said:
enditall727 said:
F0X said:
enditall727 said:
F0X said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
F0X said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
happydolphin said:
I personally think Sony would make their games mostly for a Nintendo console exclusively, due to its popularity in Japan, and no fees for online.
|
Wouldn't make sense, wrong age group. The majority of people who play the PS3 are older. God of War and just does not make sense, thats overkill. Too much blood and I doubt most parents would appreciateit when they buy a console for the family.
|
I agree. God of War belongs on a console that can't have Bayonetta.
|
LOL They can have Bayonetta, and besides that game does not represent Nintendo, it represents Sega/Platinum Games. They are trying to get the core to come over to them and I cant blame them for thinking it will work.
|
Indeed. It's almost like Sony making a kart racer in order to nab some Mario Kart fans. At least it shows an attempt at diversification, but sometimes it's best to stick with what the audience expects.
|
Yea they successfully did that with Crash Team Racing :)
|
When was that? The PS1 days? That's like me using Goldeneye 007 on N64 as an example of how Nintendo can successfully woo the CoD crowd.
|
Yea it was back in the ps1 days but they still have done it at the end of the day ;)
|
I'm not conviced that Sony is the same as they used to be. In fact, that's a big reason why I didn't buy a PS3 this generation... definitely liked them more when they were more capably enchroaching on Nintendo's audience. Even I had a PS2 several years back.
|
Actually, Sony is a changed company. They are more self sufficient. Microsoft forced them to double their first party efforts in order to keep the high flow of gaming on their console that gamers are used to. Microsoft made themselves virtually indistinguishable to them in offerings but had a more affordable console and that was the deal breaker in the beginning.
