fillet said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
kowenicki said:
What I have learned from this thread.
Move is a massive commercial success and Kinect is a massive commercial failure
The 360 "sucks" all year and pulls it out of the fire in last 6 weeks and this makes people "laugh"
Thing is... I then checked these and its a load of nonsense.
Clealy Kinect has been a massive commercial success for the period of its life and has helped keep the 360 where it has been for the last 2 years. Move is a modest success both commercially and it hype.
360 sucks all year. Well this year it has 6.2m v 7.8m for the ps3. if the 360 sucks and is therefore very bad indeed then the PS3 much just be plain bad as the difference isnt that great.
|
Kinect is the commercial success, Move is the technical success. Again, technical success means nothing if it has no games just like the Vita. The 360 always loses to the PS3 the majority of the year and in the 4th quarter pulls itself together at black friday and Christmas.
|
Technical success?...as in it actually works as opposed to Kinect in many cases?
In which case that's ridiculous because you don't say a product is a success purely for "working".
|
The Move is the most accurate piece of tech available which is able to accomplish far more than both the Kinect and the Wii aimed to accomplish. It does what they do combined, including controling the 3D space. It has no games and no marketability outside of that, which is half the reason its a commercial failure. Superior tech means nothing. Look at the Vita if you think I am wrong. The Kinect is a commercial success.
