Assassin's Creed 1-2 are two of the worst games ever created

[PullusPardus]

Jay520
didn't you tell me that I need to shut up about how boring Ass Creed is?

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=149483&page=1

AC II IS the best in the series, because it was a "good" sequel to the downright awful AC1 , then after that, its just basically the same , ACIII has a lot of variety though, but the combat is still a piece of cake with no sense of achievement, and barely any use for upgrading your weapons and using the items you get, because you can just basically kill them easily, and now they added QTE , to make it even more crap,

Platforming is still the same, keep in mind I dislike simplified platforming (like Uncharted) but this games platforming.... they might as well just tell you to let the controller down and it plays itself for you.

the story tries too hard to be interesting, but Ubisoft's idea of "BUY THE NEXT GAME TO KNOW WHAT THE FUCK JUST HAPPENED" annoys the fuck out of me, especially when I don't really want to know because by the time you finish the second game, you'll lose interest of the story, and just to let you know, nothing really happens between ACII and AC Revelations, just one main character dies and they showed this at the very end of revelations and its barely interesting since the ending is like every other AC "BUY THE NEXT GAME TO KNOW WHAT THE FUCK JUST HAPPENED!", just so that they can release another overrated Ass Creed the next year.

I am very disappointed that Ubisoft did this with ACIII , they tried to make it like Red Dead Redemption, but failed bad, that game was near perfect, and had one of the best endings in a game, ACIII had a laughable ending, and the gameplay while had "MAOR" stuff, still felt like it was very rushed, and very simplified, and people still buy these overrated games every year, oh well, its their loss, yearly games are always overrated, and rushed, people still have a hard time releasing that