Turkish said:
DanneSandin said:
Turkish said:
DanneSandin said:
Turkish said:
Sorry but PS3 version looks much better on that pic. The WiiU version may have more details but overal it looks blurry, look on the building on the right side.
Anyway, I don't care, this game was one of my GOTYs last year. |
So we can agree that Wii U isn't WEAKER than PS3? Since it has more details, but also looks a bit blurred?
Yeah, I'm really looking forward playning this game!! I'm currently playing through Asylum ^^
|
From the things Ive heard:
the cpu: ps3
gpu: wiiu
ram: tie, while wiiu has more ram it is slower than ps3 ram
|
Yes, but what you haven't heard is how they all work together. So the jury is still out on that one. And by what you have seen you must agree that Wii U isn't weaker than PS3, right?
|
Well ZombiU disappointed me, it doesn't look better than Condemned 1 for instance, but Nintendoland looks good, its shiny. But give it a year, I wanna see the 2nd gen games ^_^
|
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4905615
take a look at those two vids; PS360 didn't look good when they launched either... But I agree, ZombiU could/should have looked much better. But I think there's two reasons why this didn't happen; 1) New console means you have to learn how to use the HW right, which is quite hard in the beginning. Just look up the link I provided. 2) New IP that had undergone many changes during it's development, which means less time to get the final product ready and new IP's can be risky business, so why spend loads of money optimizing it?
